Grand Chamber hearing concerning Romania
The Court held a Grand Chamber hearing in the case of Bărbulescu v. Romania.
The case concerns the applicant’s dismissal by a private company for having used the company’s Internet for personal purposes during working hours, in breach of internal regulations.
Translations of case-law02/12/2016
To make its case-law more accessible, the Court publishes translations of its judgments, decisions and summaries in the HUDOC database. To date, some 20,000 translations in more than 30 languages have been made available on line. They emanate from governments, NGOs, associations, bar councils and academic institutions, as well as those obtained with the support of the Human Rights Trust Fund....
Information Notes (provisional versions) and the Overview of the Case-law are now available in EPUB and MOBI formats for easy reading on smartphones and tablets....
Conditions of detention in Hungary23/11/2016
The Court has decided to adjourn examination of the applications pending before it concerning conditions of detention in Hungary. It took the decision after noting that Hungary had introduced new domestic remedies which may be capable of redressing the grievances of the applicants in the cases before it.
Over 6,800 applications of this type are currently pending before the Court.
Press release (Hungarian)...
Judgment concerning Romania29/11/2016
In the case of Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others v. Romania, the Court held that there had been a violation of the right to a fair trial on account of the breach of the principle of legal certainty and on account of the length of the proceedings.
The case concerned a request for restitution of a place of worship that had belonged to the Greek Catholic Church and was transferred during the totalitarian regime to the ownership of the Orthodox Church....
Judgment concerning Belgium29/11/2016
In the case of Lhermitte v. Belgium the Court held that there had been no violation of the Convention.
The applicant, who is currently serving a life sentence for the intentional and premeditated killing of her 5 children, complained of the lack of reasons in the jury’s verdict as to her guilt and in the Assize Court’s sentencing judgment.
The Court considered that the procedure followed had enabled the applicant to understand the reasons for her conviction....
Chamber judgment concerning Armenia24/11/2016
In the case of Muradyan v. Armenia, the Court held that there has been a violation of the right to life.
The case concerned the death of the applicant’s son, a military conscript based in the Nagorno Karabakh Republic, who, according to his father, died following ill-treatment by his superiors.
The Court observed that it had already found in previous judgments that Armenia exercised effective control over Nagorno Karabakh and the surrounding territories. This death and the ensuing investigation therefore fell within the jurisdiction of Armenia, thus engaging Armenia’s responsibility under the European Convention....
Judgment concerning Azerbaijan24/11/2016
In the case of Mustafa Hajili v. Azerbaijan, the Court found a violation of the prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment.
The applicant, editor-in-chief of the newspaper Demokrat, alleged that he had been arrested in April 2011 and assaulted by police officers while in custody, after attempting to take part in a demonstration organised by opposition parties....